So, it probably means that the associate editor (AE), who handles the manuscript through the review and publication process, had a look at your manuscript and made a decision on it, most probably for rejection. Create an account to follow your favorite communities and start taking part in conversations. Wishing you the best of luck on your paper. [CDATA[// >How much time does the scientific journal 'Nature' take from - Quora Editage Insights offers a wealth of free academic research and publishing resources and is a one-stop guide for authors and others involved in scholarly publishing. Did you find it helpful? Natureuses a transparent peer review system, where for manuscripts submitted from February 2020 we can publish the reviewer comments to the authors and author rebuttal letters of published original research articles. I have been working in the Scientific Publishing Industry for more than 3 years now. It is difficult to predict the outcome of the manuscript at this stage, but you can be hopeful. The paper is accepted for publication without any further changes required from the authors. Thus, in rejecting an appeal, we do not intend to imply that our initial decision was flawless, only that the arguments for reconsideration were not sufficiently convincing to exceed the deliberately high threshold for reversing a decision. After a paper is accepted, it is subedited (copyedited) to ensure maximum clarity and reach, a process that enhances the value of papers in various ways. I love to write and share science related Stuff Here on my Website. Directly from with editor, to decision under process. //--> Disconnect between goals and daily tasksIs it me, or the industry? https://doi.org/10.1038/nn1002-917. What does the status 'under editor evaluation' mean? A referee might be selected for expertise in only one area, for example to judge if a statistical analysis is appropriate, or if a particular technique that is essential to underpin the conclusion has been undertaken properly. Is it fair to reject manuscript with few words of comments after long 9 months of review? Their role is to. Keep calm and wait: A guide to understanding journal statuses. Editorial process : Springer Support Obviously, the most difficult situations are those in which the reviewers arrive at nearly or . To complicate matters further, editors must base their decisions on evidence that is never completely reliable. answered Jul 2, 2014 at 10:14. Deciding when or whether you should write a rebuttal, determining what steps you should take next if you choose the . var d=new Date(); yr=d.getFullYear();document.write(yr); You said the finals started tomorrow. However, when they communicated their decision to the Editor-in-Chief (EiC), who makes the final decision, it was decided to reconsider your manuscript. Do roots of these polynomials approach the negative of the Euler-Mascheroni constant? Currently, the status is "Peer Review Over" and "Decision Started" since more than 15 days. As opposed to an editor, a peer reviewer advises the researcher of how he would have conducted his research, and what research methods would have made a difference. Confirm that you would also like to sign up for free personalized email coaching for this stage. 3 weeks is pretty long for this. It can impact your confidence and make you question your ability and skill. Scott, Michael - Ancient Worlds_ A Global History of Antiquity | PDF ensure that the terminology and notation conform to. if you strongly disagree with the editorial decision, you can appeal against it unless the editor has clearly specified otherwise. This will reduce delays. I submitted a MS to a Nature-Branded Journal on 9/10 and today the status changed to "Editor Decision Started". If the journal lowers its threshold for publication, its reputation will decline, devaluing the achievements of thousands of previously accepted authors. Allegations of referee bias are seldom persuasive unless substantiated by strong evidence; we presume our referees are acting in good faith unless proved otherwise, and having sought their advice, we feel an obligation to take it seriously. Many journals now rely on editorial management systems, which are supposed to support the administration and decision making of editors, while aiming at making the process of communication faster and more transparent to both reviewers and authors. How long do editor decisions take at Science/Nature? So dont feel upset! A vital, and often overlooked, aspect of peer review is that in the current system, peer reviewers are normally not paid for their work. queensland figure skating. 9.3 weeks. [CDATA[// > I was shocked and disappointed by your rejection letter, authors write, hundreds of times each year, I must ask that you reconsider your decision. Rejection is of course a fact of life for all scientists, particularly when they submit their work to highly selective journals; in less than five years since its inception, Nature Neuroscience, for example, has turned away over 6000 manuscripts, roughly 90% of all submissions. Reviewing excellence - Boer - Creativity and Innovation Management [2] In any state, sovereignty is assigned to the person, body, or institution that has the ultimate authority over other people in order to establish a law or change . The SEC pay-to-play rule for investment advisers as it turns 12 !1997 F350 XLT 4x4 Crew Cab (4 door) 7.3 Liter V-8 Diesel Powerstroke, Automatic with overdrive, Dana 60 front axle, Weld Racing Wheels and Toyo Open Country Radials (tires and wheels cost $4500) only 66,000 original miles Located in Seattle Washington 98188 1 mile from Seatac AirportI . Based on the Nature Review Speed Feedback System, it takes editor 118.0 days to accept manuscript. Sovereignty - Wikipedia Answer: Such quick changes may mean a glitch, but given that it's a Nature journal, that's unlikely. Editing and proofreading services for a publication-ready manuscript, Customized service packs to match all publication needs, Expert help for all academic translation needs. Editor decision started might sound like the editor is going to bench reject your paper, but thats not necessarily the case. And "wish you the best in your future endeavors" is the rejection letter equivalent of your crush signing "Have a great summer" in your yearbook. the editor usually submits a brief comment on the article to the editor in chief who then has the final say and will make the decision available to you. If authors wish to contest an editorial decision, we ask them to submit a form that organizes their arguments into categories that we find useful in reviewing our original judgments. availability to assess the manuscript within the requested time. The journal opened for submissions on April 20, 2016. To avoid such conflicts of interest, Nature requires potential referees to disclose any professional and commercial competing interests before undertaking to review a paper, and requires referees not to copy papers or to circulate them to un-named colleagues. The corresponding (or other single designated) author is responsible on behalf of all co-authors for the accuracy of all content, including spelling of names and current affiliations of all co-authors, so please ensure these are checked carefully. All referees agree to Nature's conditions before Nature sends them a manuscript to assess. [CDATA[// >